The Fiduciary Implications of Distinguishing Between RI and ESG
With the amount of data available, Responsible Investing (RI) and Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) considerations can seem overwhelming. In this article, Mark Webster, Director, Institutional & Advisory, BMO ETFs, finds a signal in the noise, breaking down the difference between RI and ESG, and examining key considerations for Investment Counsellors and Family Offices.Apr. 18, 2023
Investment Counselling firms and Multi-Family Offices have core strengths in specific areas but may find that their resources are limited in others, potentially posing limitations in meeting investor requirements in specific mandates. The most obvious challenge is in what is generally termed Responsible Investment, a field with seemingly limitless opinions and aspirations. There are over 1,000 data points to distil, making it impossible to demonstrate genuine capabilities in a very important analysis and execution process.
Further complicating the issues, it can be difficult to distinguish between Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) and ESG factor considerations, potentially causing misunderstandings between investors and for their advisors. Some observers have spoken about there being a spectrum — a continuum from SRI to ESG factor considerations. Fortunately, one particularly valuable study relating to pension fund investment1 identifies a stark distinction between the two, identifying the fiduciary implications which may ensue if the two concepts are misunderstood or improperly executed:
- SRI identifies themes or causes and may result in over- or under-weighting companies, industries or sectors to achieve measurable outcomes to meet qualitative or non-financial objectives;
- ESG factor considerations are a fiduciary risk management approach that seeks to avoid controversial business practices which may impair capital. As such, they should be taken into account as part of the security evaluation process.
It can be difficult to distinguish between SRI and ESG factor considerations, potentially causing misunderstandings between investors and for their advisors.
Understanding RI and ESG implications
Source: McCarthy Tetrault LLP, Pension Fund Investment: Managing Environmental, Social and Governance Factor Integration, Randy Bauslaugh and Dr. Hendrik Garz, May 1, 2019.
It is important to note that a lawyer specializing in workplace pensions and benefits made this distinction, not a data provider or an academic. Fiduciary duty is fundamental to common law, governing all discretionary decisions made by trustees and other fiduciaries. Because Investment Counselling firms operate with discretion, as do many Family Offices, it is critical for practitioners to guide client discussions to create a clear understanding of how their qualitative preferences about climate, human rights or corporate governance can be expressed in an investment portfolio. RI and ESG present a push/pull effect on investors. They may be pushed to align capital with causes or non-financial outcomes they support but, in doing so, they are also distorting the data set with which to generate required rates of returns.
In contrast, ESG factor considerations, because of their fiduciary risk management nature, may pull the exposure to the centre, providing more market-like returns. Though this is not, in itself, a bad thing, critics may question if enough is being done to meet non-financial objectives.
A central consideration for Investment Counsellors is the challenge RI and ESG pose to their business models. Efficiencies are created when portfolios can be modelled to provide consistency and scalability as the firm grows. Customizing to individual objectives, which invariably results when waging RI discussions, will place significant demands on limited resources and could, potentially, increase the need for Compliance oversight.
It may be better to outsource RI/ESG exposures to an asset manager, so your firm has both robust data screening and consistent, scalable solutions.
The advantage of investing in an ETF is that it has three liquidity levels, which provide counselling firms with greater flexibility to manage flows as required:
- Natural liquidity between sellers and buyers across Canada’s exchanges, measured by average daily volume;
- Market maker inventory (Capital Markets desks normally hold units in reserve to match Sell & Buy orders);
- Creation and redemption, which operates just as it would for any pooled investment.
In addition, an index ETF has explicit rules and exclusions, which replicate the constituent holdings of the relevant index, to determine whether the ETF’s exposure meets investor requirements while also seeking to generate required rates of return. The example below outlines the exclusions in the MSCI ESG Leaders indices, which certain BMO ESG Index ETFs follow:
Establishing rules: Refining the exposure
|Business Involvement Exclusions - the Refinement|
|Alcohol||Producer earnings 50% of revenue or over $1billion in revenue (LVMH)|
|Gambling||Producer earnings 50% of revenue or over $1billion in revenue|
|Tobacco||Producer earnings 50% of revenue or over $1billion in revenue|
|Nuclear Power||Companies with over 6,000 mega watts capacity or over 50% capacity from nuclear sources / companies involved in uranium mining / companies involved in nuclear plan design or construction|
|Conventional Weaponry||Companies earning 50% of revenues or over $3billion in revenues|
|Nuclear Weaponry||All companies manufacturing systems or components|
|Controversial Weaponry||All companies involved in manufacture of landmines, cluster bombs, uranium weapons, blinding lasers, biological or chemical weapons|
|Civilian Firearms||Companies earning 50% or more than $100million in revenues|
|Unconventional Energy||Thermal coal, shale gas, oil sands, coal bed methane & coal seam gas|
|Conventional Energy||Arctic onshore or offshore, deep water, shallow water or on/off shore|
Source: MSCI ESG Leaders Indexes Methodology, November 2020.
A central consideration for Investment Counsellors is the challenge RI and ESG pose to their business models.
Transparency in reporting
Transparency is part of the consensus-building process, and measurement helps to establish it. Investors want to know or to measure what their capital allocations achieve. We regularly use objective benchmarks to measure investment performance, and similar clarity is available for RI/ESG considerations through our BMO ETFs ESG Quarterly Report Card.
The report shows:
- Aggregate ESG scores for the benchmark and for each ESG Leaders Index ETF;
- Tabulates E, S & G at the component level, for both the benchmark and each ESG Leaders Index ETF;
- Measures Carbon Risk reduction;
- Reveals improvements in Social and Governance metrics;
- Performance of each ESG Leaders Index ETF relative to its broad benchmark;
- Standard Deviation of each ESG Leaders Index ETF relative to its broad benchmark.
Investment Counselling firms cannot afford to skirt discussions on RI/ESG, but they must avoid the subject turning into a Pandora’s Box. A consistent, transparent rules-based index ETF solution provides a scalable, measurable solution for counsellors to implement RI/ESG into client portfolios, maintaining a high-quality screening methodology.
BMO Global Asset Management has a robust Stewardship policy, which engages with management of investee companies and, when required, votes for change in proxy events in accordance with its publicly available Corporate Governance Guidelines. This ensures that the best interests of investors are being represented right through the investment process, from definition to execution to monitoring.
Just as we engage with investee companies as part of our Stewardship activities, we welcome queries, comments, or criticisms from you. Please let us know what interests you.
For more insights and information, view our BMO ESG ETFs Quarterly Report Card.
1 Randy Bauslaugh and Dr. Hendrik Garz, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, Pension Fund Investment: Managing Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Factor Integration, May 1, 2019.
Any statement that necessarily depends on future events may be a forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although such statements are based on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations. Investors are cautioned not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements. In connection with any forward-looking statements, investors should carefully consider the areas of risk described in the most recent prospectus of the BMO ETFs.
The viewpoints expressed by the author represents his assessment of the markets at the time of publication. Those views are subject to change without notice at any time. The information provided herein does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy, or an offer to sell securities nor should the information be relied upon as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The statistics in this update are based on information believed to be reliable but not guaranteed.
This article is for information purposes. The information contained herein is not, and should not be construed as, investment, tax or legal advice to any party. Investments should be evaluated relative to the individual’s investment objectives and professional advice should be obtained with respect to any circumstance.
Commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investments in exchange traded funds. Please read the ETF facts or prospectus before investing. The indicated rates of return are the historical annual compounded total returns including changes in unit value and reinvestment of all dividends or distributions and do not take into account sales, redemption, distribution or optional charges or income taxes payable by any unitholder that would have reduced returns. Exchange traded funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.
For a summary of the risks of an investment in the BMO ETFs, please see the specific risks set out in the prospectus. BMO ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade at a discount to their net asset value, which may increase the risk of loss. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.
BMO ETFs are managed by BMO Asset Management Inc., which is an investment fund manager and a portfolio manager, and a separate legal entity from Bank of Montreal.
BMO Global Asset Management is a brand name under which BMO Asset Management Inc. and BMO Investments Inc. operate.
®/™Registered trademarks/trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under licence.