Liquidity without compromise: how effective evergreens balance optionality with return potential
Family offices and other UHNW investors are rethinking allocation structures in private markets as asset class exposure gains importance in portfolios, yet capital restrictions frustrate efforts to maintain optionality and flexibility.
May 26, 2026
Wealth investors have become much more comfortable in recent years incorporating private equity, infrastructure and private credit into portfolios for a variety of reasons, not least because of expanding access. The appeal is obvious: broader diversification, lower correlation to public markets and exposures to parts of the global economy increasingly unavailable on public exchanges.
There is, however, a difficult question that comes up during bouts of market volatility: What happens when investors want liquidity1 back?
Recent turbulence across segments of the alternatives landscape — particularly within private credit in evergreen structures — has forced allocators to confront the operational realities underpinning private markets investing. Redemption queues, gating provisions and liquidity restrictions that once seemed largely an afterthought suddenly became central concerns across family offices, investment counsellors and ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) portfolios.
For many investors, performance isn’t the rub, but rather optionality. Allocators who have made material moves into private asset vehicles may not have expected daily liquidity but they also did not anticipate a complete surrender of flexibility at moments when capital might be needed elsewhere.
That tension is now reshaping how these clients evaluate private markets exposure altogether.
The conversation is moving beyond simplistic debates around whether gating is “good” or “bad,” and toward a more nuanced examination of fund and vehicle structures themselves: how liquidity is managed, how diversified the investor base is, the overall sophistication of the operating platform and whether managers possess the institutional infrastructure necessary to withstand periods of market stress.
In that context, evergreen structures are increasingly being viewed not as a compromise between liquidity and long-term investing, but as a middle ground between the two. The strongest structures are attempting to preserve what investors want most from private markets — differentiated returns, diversification and long-duration growth exposure — while still maintaining measured optionality when liquidity needs arise.
For this market segment, that balance is fast-becoming a defining challenge in successful portfolio construction.
Disclaimers:
For Advisor and Institutional Client Use Only.
“BMO (M-bar roundel symbol)” is a registered trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under licence.
BMO Global Asset Management (BMO GAM) is a brand name under which BMO Asset Management Inc. and BMO Investments Inc. operate. Certain of the products and services offered under the brand name, BMO Global Asset Management, are designed specifically for various categories of investors in Canada and may not be available to all investors. Products and services are only offered to investors in Canada in accordance with applicable laws and regulatory requirements.
The information contained herein: (1) is confidential and proprietary to BMO GAM; (2) may not be reproduced or distributed without the prior written consent of BMO GAM; and (3) has been obtained from third-party sources believed to be reliable but which have not been independently verified. BMO GAM and its affiliates do not accept any responsibility for any loss or damage that results from the use of this information. This article has been prepared solely for information purposes by BMO GAM.
The information provided herein does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy, or an offer to sell securities nor should the information be relied upon as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Certain statements included in this material constitute forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, those identified by the expressions “expect”, “intend”, “will” and similar expressions. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts but reflect BMO GAM’s current expectations regarding future results or events. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations. Although BMO GAM believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and, accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein. BMO GAM undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statement or information whether as a result of new information, future events or other such factors which affect this information, except as required by law.
The attached material is provided to you on the understanding that you will understand and accept its inherent limitations, you will not rely on it in making or recommending any investment decision with respect to any securities that may be issued, and you will use it only for the purpose of considering your preliminary interest in investing in a transaction of the type described herein. An investment in the BMO Partners Group Private Markets Fund (the BMO PG Fund) described hereby is speculative. A subscription for units of the BMO PG Fund should be considered only by persons financially able to maintain their investment and who can bear the risk of loss associated with an investment in the BMO PG Fund. Prospective investors should consult with their own independent professional legal, tax, investment and financial advisors before purchasing units of the BMO PG Fund in order to determine the appropriateness of this investment in relation to their financial and investment objectives and in relation to the tax consequences of any such investment. Prospective investors should consider the risks described in the confidential offering memorandum (OM) of the BMO PG Fund before purchasing units of the BMO PG Fund. Any or all of these risks, or other as yet unidentified risks, may have a material adverse effect on the BMO PG Fund’s business and/or the return to investors. See “Investment Objective, Investment Strategy and Certain Risks” in the OM of the BMO PG Fund. In addition to the risks described in the OM of the BMO PG Fund, the BMO PG Fund will bear the risks associated with the Partners Group BMO Master Limited (Master Fund) in proportion to the amount of the BMO PG Fund’s investment in the Master Fund. Prospective investors in the BMO PG Fund should therefore carefully consider the risks described under “Certain risk factors”, “Business and structure related risks”, “Adviser related risks”, “Investment-related risks” and “Limits of risk disclosure” in the OM of the Master Fund.